Rio Grande Valley Tops List of “America’s Poorest Cities”
By Jason Cohen
11 April 2016
RGV on America's Poorest Cities List-Texas Monthly Article
Last month, Harlingen topped a Cost of Living survey, earning it the title of “America’s Least Expensive City. And neighboring McAllen came in third.
Now, the inevitable flip side to such data. The two Rio Grande Valley metropolitan areas have finished no. 1(McAllen-Edinburg-Mission) and 2 (Brownsville-Harlingen) on a list of “America’s Poorest Cities” (or, if you prefer, 365th and 366th on a list of “America’s Richest Cities”) by the website 24-7 Wall Street.
- See more at: http://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/rio-grande-valley-tops-list-of-americas-poorest-cities/
06 April 2016
Texas Monthly article What Are The Most Walkable Neighborhoods In Texas?
What Are The Most Walkable Neighborhoods In
Texas?
By Dan Solomon
Texas cities don’t have a great rep for walkability. Like, you technically can walk around most cities in Texas, but doing so isn’t always super pleasant. Blame it on the relentless sunshine, the lack of sidewalks, the fact that everything is spread out because it was mostly built with cars in mind, or a population that would rather drive—but the fact is that, when you compare any city in Texas to, say, New York, San Francisco, Miami, or Chicago, you’re going to wish you had your car.
See more at: http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/walkable-neighborhoods-texas/
01 April 2016
LNG Article from The Brownsville Herald
Lease option fees generated $4.4 million last year
By STEVE CLARK Staff Writer of The Herald
From the perspective of Port of Brownsville officials, liquefied natural gas is a win even if the port never sees a single LNG facility get built.
Plans by three companies that want to build LNG liquefaction/export terminals at the port are under review by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Environmentalists have been highly critical of the plans, which have also caused nervousness among some local officials.
A global glut of natural gas makes bringing new export capacity online unfeasible at present, though the companies eyeing the port — Annova, NextDecade and Texas LNG — are planning far ahead and wouldn’t be operational until around 2020.
In the meantime, the port is collecting lease option payments from those companies. Port commission chairman Ralph Cowen said that through December, the three LNG companies paid more than $4.4 million in nonrefundable lease option fees on 2,280 acres. In 2016, the port expects to collect $1.3 million, he said.
Before the LNG companies came along, the land was only generating grazing fees — $2 an acre, Cowen said.
“We would get probably somewhere in the neighborhood of $3,500 a year,” he said...
To see the full article follow go to the below link:
http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/premium/article_db39be78-f6ee-11e5-8825-cb6b8741c8d2.html
Article from San Jose Mercury News BUSINESS section
Recycling tech gadgets to reduce environmental pollution
By George Avalos, gavalos@bayareanewsgroup.com
The Silicon Valley innovation miracle that has ushered in dizzying new ways for people to live, work and play also has intensified the pressure to find environmentally responsible ways to dispose of gadgets rendered obsolete.
To see the full article go to:
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_29633387/recycling-tech-gadgets-reduce-environmental-pollution
28 February 2016
Change in hunting program at Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge
| Laguna Atascosa Picture taken from U.S. FWS website |
This upcoming hunting season, a new system is being offered through the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Those that become a part of this new system won't have to re-register every year; all that is need is a onetime online registration. For more information follow the link below.
http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/local/article_5bcfffb8-dc3a-11e5-89cf-97642d2d8be5.html
04 February 2016
09 November 2015
Importance of Trees in South Texas
Importance
of Trees in South Texas
By
J. Cantu
With a steady increase of
the world’s population now residing in cities, there is greater need to
understand how the complex interactions between the natural environment and
humans affect ecosystem services on multiple levels, especially for those that
are particularly important in the functioning and resilience of urban areas.
Ecosystem services, or the goods or benefits derived from nature, provide
mankind with most necessities of life and survival (Brown, Bergstrp et al.
2007, Wratten, Sandhu et al. 2013), and are often divided into separate
categories : supporting services (such as water and nutrient cycling),
provisioning services (i.e., production of food, fuel, and timber), regulating
services (such as rainwater retention, carbon sequestration), and cultural
services (aesthetic and spiritual values) (Sandhu and Wratten 2013). We know
nature provides a multitude of services to the community, yet a commonly
underappreciated function, is the growth of urban trees.
This
is a common sight when it rains in the valley. When looking at the street, many
buildings, streets, and sidewalks can be seen. These impervious surfaces
prevent water from draining and causes flooding. On the other hand, there is
only a handful of trees that can be seen. Trees function like
retention/detention structures (Nowak and Dwyer
2007), ultimately slowing down the rate of runoff. As the amount of
impervious surfaces increases with urbanization, it becomes increasingly
difficult to mitigate storm water runoff and cost-effective options become
limited (Barber, King et al. 2003). Due
to urban areas consisting of mostly impermeable structures, rainwater tends to
collect and cause flooding. When flooding can be attributed to inadequate city
drainage, this can be a result of poor urbanization practices (Pelling 2003).
Anyone who has lived in
the Rio Grande Valley, knows about the valley heat, especially in summer. Urban
trees cast shade and can shield from the wind, in which alters the neighboring
heat islands which can directly reduce solar heat gain through windows, walls,
and roofs (Akbari 2002). Trees also lower
surrounding air temperatures through evapotranspiration cooling, which can in
turn lead to cooler temperatures and less smog formation (McPherson, Nowak et al. 1997, Akbari 2002).
According to Dwyer, McPherson et al. (1992),
the annual space air-conditioning and heating cost for a home with efficiently
placed trees can be 4% lower, while a home with conflicting placed trees can cost
up to 9% more.
Trees
also help sequester a range of pollutants, even the pesky greenhouse gases. Trees
sequester carbon from the atmosphere during their growing phase. Although trees
are not the answer for reducing atmospheric carbon, they work as a short term
carbon sink as they grow (Jo and McPherson 1995). Airborne pollutants are also
a consequence of urbanization, and the removal of airborne particulates is a
health benefit that is of interest (Jim and Chen 2009). These airborne
chemicals can be sequestered as well by trees, allowing people to avoid harmful
pollutants. If urban forests can be promoted as means of mitigating pollution
within the scope of urban sustainability, then they can be used to improve
quality of life for people around the world (Escobedo, Kroeger et al. 2011).
In a study completed on the University of Texas- Pan
American campus, four regulating services (rainwater retention, electricity
savings by shade cast, pollution and carbon sequestration) were estimated and
valuated. As seen in the figure, the trees on campus provide services the
university. These trees have worth and these trees are not just bound by the
services described above. These few services only cover a fraction of what
trees can do for the community. These above services only slightly cover the
regulating services group. Trees also provide provisioning services (lumber and
fruits), cultural services (education and recreation), and supporting services
(habitat and biodiversity).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
